The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) is calling for greater transparency for Scottish taxpayers – just hours after Finance Minister John Swinney delivered Scotland’s Budget, the first in which Scotland has the power to set its own income tax rate.
It’s appealing for more awareness of Scottish taxpayer status and greater transparency around how their tax is distributed.
Moira Kelly, chair of the CIOT’s Scottish Taxes Sub-Committee, said: “This is a momentous day for Scotland and marks a significant step forward in the devolution of fiscal powers north of the border.
“The income tax rates are to remain the same as in the rest of the UK for the time being, but far greater autonomy over rates and bands is due to be devolved as early as 2017 and may induce the Scottish Government to alter Scotland’s income tax landscape in the near future.
“Whilst there may appear to be no immediate impact on the Scottish taxpayer, this new autonomy underscores the need for greater communication between HMRC and taxpayers in Scotland.
“Public awareness remains low which is a concern as the smooth transition to a new rate is dependent on those affected knowing how they will be affected. For the sake of transparency, we have previously called for the proportion of income tax going directly to the Scottish government to be explicitly detailed on the P60 form.”
The Scottish Rate of Income Tax (SRIT) was introduced by the Scotland Act 2012 and enables the Scottish Government to set a Scottish rate of income tax.
But that’s not the only tax the CIOT is concerned about.
Kelly added: “Mr Swinney also announced a new Land and Buildings Transaction Tax levy on the purchase of second homes from April 2016. The levy is 3% for a £40k property rising to 15% for a £750k+ property.
“Those looking to purchase a property for buy-to-let or simply as a second home will now be faced with a significantly increased LBTT bill, compounded by the recent phased restriction on tax relief for buy-to-let financing costs.
“After the Westminster Government copied the Scottish Government in abolishing the ‘slab’ system for taxing residential property sales, this is now Scotland copying Westminster in bringing in a second home levy.
“We can draw two lessons from this. First, that a politically attractive idea launched in one place may be copied – and perhaps quickly – on the other side of the border. Second – and the ‘no change’ approach to the income tax rate feeds into this too – that political as well as economic competition could well act to keep the devolved and Westminster tax systems in broad alignment, with the exceptions being on matters where differences reflect the circumstances and calculations of both jurisdictions. This could well hold true even after more extensive tax devolution kicks in.”